Thursday, May 13, 2010

PR factor and ranking websites


PR factor and ranking websites

Is the Google PR is becoming more important, which explains this? It would seem that, given a barrage of the topic at various forums for webmasters in connection with the forthcoming update PR. DP, Sitepoint, Namepros all have different themes, where one of the members seemed to notice changes in PR in one of their sites and declares that the PR update is underway. There are many answers to such topics, most of them insignificant.
Originally, PR was designed in such a way that the importance of a page can be determined based on numbers from 0 to 10 - 0 being the low value and 10 is the highest. The logic is, if more sites link to your site, then you have an important place and has the relevant documents. Fair enough. This happened when webmasters could manipulate PR, linking their own sites with each other, as well as buying links from other sites. This means that sites with valuable information could not have higher PR, than other sites that are more useful.

Alexa another system, which attempted to rank websites. This was done according to the number of visitors visiting the site. Tracking was / is performed on the toolbar Alexa. Since the number of people using panel data captured as little distorted. Again, the webmaster is known to manipulate the results, set your own website as the home page of its own system on the Alexa Toolbar installed!
It is clear that both Alexa and PR is not a true reflection of the value of the site, but webmasters continue to patronize them. Typically, the cost of a link to a Web site, or the cost of the site itself is changing dramatically with more Alexa and PR. Although the number of webmasters agree that PR has nothing to do, it will survive as long as there are webmasters obsessed with "the little green toolbar.
Sharing his views on what should be a better way to rank websites. Should it be an expense of integration Alexa and Google PR algorithms? Or should it be based on the feedback system, as StumbleUpon? Or trying to rank websites very bad concept considering that this is a very good quality?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.